Sunday, February 26, 2023

Entry 652: Stomach Bug Break

Some sort of stomach bug going around these days. I and both the boys got it. It hit me Tuesday night. Driving back to S's parents' house from Disney World I started to feel some, um, unnatural movement in my bowels, and then I spent most of Wednesday sitting on the toilet. There's never a good place to get a stomach bug, but S's parents' is among the least worst places. It's a one-story bungalow with three bathrooms, so there is always a toilet nearby, and, most importantly, said toilets are equipped with bidets. That's huge. You don't have to use rolls and rolls of toilet paper nor do you have to rub yourself raw to keep clean.

In general, the bidet is a way underutilized contraption here in America. I don't understand why they aren't more popular. You can get near shower-level cleanliness after each dump, and it saves toilet paper. What's the issue? The only reason I can figure that they aren't a societal standard is because people think they're weird. But everything is weird until it's not. Why is spraying water on your bootie hole any weirder than wiping it with tissue? (In fact, if I didn't know any better, I would definitely think the latter was weirder than the former, as it requires you to interact much more intimately with your poop.) I think I'm going to get a bidet attachment for the toilet in our master-bedroom bathroom. The kind my in-laws have looks easy enough to attach and works great. If that turns out to be the case here, then I'll get one for every other toilet in the house, and then I'll proselytize about it to everybody I know. It'll be the American bidet revolution!

Despite the sicknesses, we were miraculously able to get in a relatively healthy day at Magic Kingdom. Lil' S1 felt a bit under the weather when we first arrived, but he really perked up as the day went along. Space Mountain was one of the first rides we went on, and I was really nervous going into it that he was going to get really sick and throw up. (I made sure not to sit behind him.) But instead it gave him the adrenaline dose his body needed or something like that because he was totally fine after that.

The day was pretty much as expected. Theme parks like this are fine but don't do much for me. I don't really like the rides, and I resent the lines and costs. S's parents gave the kids some money to spend (I'm embarrassed to say how much), so that defrayed expenses a little bit, but just a little bit. We still had to pay for the tickets and the parking and the gas to get there, etc., and that's a lot of money.

We went cheap(ish) on the food too. S's mom made, like, ten PBJs and packed them with a bunch of snacks in a little cooler that could fit in a backpack. I don't think any of the kids ate them (we met another family there, so there were five kids total), but I had at least three myself. It's better than the food you can get there, honestly. I mean, there's probably some decent grub there if you want to look for it, but all I saw was ballpark fare -- subpar chicken fingers, greasy fries, and plastic-container salads consisting of little else than lettuce and croutons. I got this pineapple float made with "soft serve whip" as my sweet treat for the day and was supremely disappointed with it. To make matters worse, we got the kids ice cream later (real, delicious ice cream), and it looked so good, but I felt compelled to abstain.

Just being at Disney World made me want to go on a diet. I spent a good portion of the day dodging obese people on those Rascal scooters. Distressingly, many of them didn't look that much older than me, and there's no way they all got that big from thyroid issues. That's mostly shit eating and lack of exercise. I get the idea behind the "healthy at any size" movement, and I'm not into body shaming (it doesn't help), but everything has its limits. At some point we have to face the fact that, much like we were with cigarettes a generation ago, we are losing a lot of quality years by eating so much junk food. It really is the public health catastrophe we know about but kinda pretend we don't. We've all read articles like the one I've linked to above, and we acknowledge them, and then we all kinda nod our heads and shrug our shoulders and go right back to eating (and feeding our children) the same ultra-processed food and drinking the same sugary drinks as we did before. How can we not when they are at our fingertips 24/7?

Alright a lightning round and then I'm out.

  • My digestive system seems to have overcompensated and now things aren't moving fast enough down there. I've been hitting the psyllium husk pretty hard the past few days.

  • We watched the movie Everything Everywhere All at Once recently. I don't get it and didn't really enjoy it. I pulled a bait-and-switch on myself. I only looked at the cast, not the plot summary, and thought I was settling in to watch a tale about immigration and intergenerational differences, and that's what I got at first, and then it turned into David Lynch directing The Matrix. (Michelle Yeoh's presence should have tipped me off that some martial arts would be involved.) I was into it for about a half-hour and then it became borderline unwatchable. (In fact, S literally stopped watching. I stubbornly finished it.) I haven't been this disappointed in a mid-movie genre transformation since From Dusk Till Dawn, which switches from super compelling to crime story to super stupid vampire movie halfway through.

  • If you love movies (like me), but don't watch many (like me), sitting through a bad movie is especially painful because it's a wasted opportunity. We were trying to decide between Everything Everywhere All at Once and The Banshees of Inisherin, and clearly we made the wrong choice. To make matters worse, I downloaded Banshees on my iPad to watch on the flight back, but the app glitched, and it wouldn't play. So annoying.

  • I was able to watch the three-part documentary Stolen Youth: Inside the Cult of Sarah Lawrence this past week. It's so fucked up and would probably be too bleak to watch if not for the fact that the leader will almost certainly die in prison, and all but one (maybe) of the abused subjects has denounced their abuser and now recognizes the cult for what it was (and has seemingly started the healing process). I really recommend the doc if you can stomach scenes of psychological, and in some cases physical, abuse. It's very interesting, and there is so much real-time footage, because the cult leader is a paranoid nutjob who filmed his misdeeds thinking they somehow illustrated a conspiracy against him. (In a nice bit of irony, they instead provided crucial evidence in the case against him.)

  • I've been kinda following the controversy over Roald Dahl's publisher making some changes to his books. Like many children of the '80s, Dahl was my favorite author back in the day, and I read (or had read to me) most his books. I have no issue whatsoever letting my kids consume his work. (We started James and the Giant Peach last summer, but lost the copy and never resumed.) He was openly anti-Semitic, but he's also dead. For me, a lot of the conflict of "separating an artist from their art" goes away once they die and can no longer personally profit from my consumption of their work.

    As for this censorship stuff, I see both sides. On one hand, counterintuitively, sometimes you have to change something to be true to its roots. I'm thinking of baseball (stay with me), in which the reluctance of the powers-that-be to change the rules of the game, has allowed it to morph into something different (and less interesting) than it was when I first found it 40 years ago. (Starting pitchers no longer matter as much; guys don't steal that many bases; fewer balls are put in play; etc.) Things exist within their context, so if context changes and the things don't change, then they do change within their context. Some words mean different things today than they did in 1970, so if you want to convey the same feeling as back then, you might have to use different words. It's not necessarily censorship; it's updating it for a new audience.

    On the other hand, I think we do our children a disservice trying to sanitize everything for them. They need to hear words like "fat" and "stupid" in a low-stake setting because they're going to hear them at some point in an adversarial context and need to be able to handle it without crawling into the fetal position. That's one reason I hate all this booking banning bullshit that's going on in schools in Florida (and other places). I think it's a net positive if kids have access to literature, even stuff that is problematic or explicit and arguably not age appropriate. It's like, they are going to be exposed to this stuff at some point. Would you rather it be from a book in a school library or some other, much less safe, situation? 

  • Perhaps worse than being sick for a few days, I developed a canker on the roof of my mouth. It has been driving me crazy. As soon as it starts to feel better, I eat something (because, you know, I have to eat to live), and it gets inflamed and bothers me again. It's in a spot where there is no way I can chew and avoid it. I also can't help but subconsciously rub my tongue against it compulsively, which certainly doesn't help. I think it's finally, maybe almost gone, but I've thought that everyday this past week, and it's still frickin' there. So... *resign shrug*.

Until next time...

Saturday, February 18, 2023

Entry 651: More Disney!

Not too much time to blog this weekend. We are headed out early tomorrow to visit S's parents in Florida. We are going to Disney World again -- this time Magic Kingdom. I hope that this isn't going to become an annual tradition. Even without getting a hotel room (S's parents live close enough that we can do a long day trip) it's expensive. And it's too crowded and not that fun besides. I mean, it is fun, but not that fun. It's fun if you don't have to do it again for a really long time. It's not the type of thing I want to make a habit of doing every time we visit S's parents... not that there is much else to do there.

We might not have gone to Disney this time, but we learned another family from the kids' school independently planning a trip there for mid-winter break, and somehow the idea of us joining them was broached, and so we figured, why not? We need something big to do to break up the week, anyway. It'll be fine, but it's definitely one of those events I'm more looking forward to being over with than I am actually doing. You know what I mean? It's like, I want to do it because I want to spend time and have precious moments with my family, but I'm not that keen on the actual experience. Basically, I just want the memories.

But that's not how life works... or is it? Maybe all life is is memories. Like, each moment in time you are somehow popping into existence in a different form totally defined by its memories. The you you are right now isn't the you you will be in one millisecond, but you will think it is because the you you will be in a millisecond will have the memories of always being that you. The you you are now will be totally forgotten, just as the you you are now has forgotten the you you were one millisecond ago. Maybe that's how it works.

Okay, that's enough stoner talk. I gotta get some sleep.

Until next time...

Sunday, February 12, 2023

Entry 650: Super Bowl LVII

Super Bowls are demarcated using Roman numerals, with one exception. Super Bowl 50 is called Super Bowl 50 because the powers-that-be thought that Super Bowl L looks weird. I guess it does, but, in my opinion, it looks less weird than seeing one obvious outlier in the list of Super Bowls.* In a way, it is fitting that Super Bowl 50 is an outlier in how it is enumerated, as the game itself was an outlier. It was among the worst Super Bowls ever -- a terrible, yawn-inducing game. It was a punt-and-turnover-fest (21 total), featuring a decrepit Peyton Manning quarterbacking one team and a total outmatched Cam Newton quarterbacking the other. I remember watching it at some friends' house on their massive TV (like 100 inches) and thinking to myself, So much screen wasted on this awful game. At least the company was good.

*I wonder what they will do at the 100th Super Bowl. Will it be Super Bowl 50 or Super Bowl C?  Will there ever be a 100th Super Bowl? Will I be alive to see it? I would be 88 and I love football, so hopefully on both accounts.

Although, now that I look at it, maybe it wasn't such an outlier game. The boring Super Bowl is unfortunately making a bit of a comeback. When I became a cognizant football fan, around age 7 (1984), the Super Bowl was entering into a strange period in which almost every game was noncompetitive and boring. For a nearly 20-year stretch, there were exactly three exciting Super Bowls (Giants-Bills, Broncos-Packers, Rams-Titans), everything else was a blowout or a slog. Then, something changed, and for about 15 years the Super Bowl was reasonably close almost every year, and we got a bunch of all-time classics like Patriots-Panthers, Steelers-Cardinals, Ravens-49ers, and (so help me) Patriots-Seahawks. But since 2014 it's been a mixed bag. The Patriots comeback win against the Falcons and their loss the next year to the Eagles were both really fun games, but their victory over the Rams was arguably worse to watch than Super Bowl 50 (it's the lowest-scoring Super Bowl ever -- 16 total points), and the Bucs-Chiefs game was also an awful spectator experience. So, we shall see how it goes tonight.

The Super Bowl is mostly for the tourists, anyway. Unless your team is in it (which has happened three glorious times for me), the "real" NFL fans prefer the early rounds of the playoffs or even important regular-season weeks. Back when I used to spend every Sunday in a sports bar, the first week of the season was my favorite one. But it's kinda good that I'm not that invested in tonight's game. We're going to some friends' house (not the ones with the humongous TV), and it will be easier to socialize (and eat) this way. Also, we will have to leave at halftime (no Ri-ri for us) and miss much of the third quarter. The game starts too damn late on the East Coast. If we actually stayed for the entire thing, the kids wouldn't be in bed until 11:00. They really should move up kickoff to 4:00. That would be 1:00 on the West Coast, which seems fine to me. It might even be better than 3:30 (the current West Coast kickoff time) because it would line up nicely with lunch.

Anyway... let's lightning round the rest of this entry.

  • S is back, which is nice. The single-dadding this week was a bit more challenging because Lil' S1 got sick and stayed home most of Thursday and all of Friday. It's some sort of throat issue that is not Covid. It could be what I got a few weeks ago, but it's a milder strain, as he's been able to function pretty normally, other than only being able to eat really soft foods for a few days. He says he feels better now, so hopefully we're past it.

  • We are having some work done on our house (screening in our back deck) and one of the construction workers got his wallet stolen from his car in front of our house. Our neighbor caught the entire thing on his security camera. Somebody drove past our house, put their car in reverse and rolled back to it, and then started trying to unlock every door of every car parked in the area, until they found one that was unlocked. Unfortunately, the footage wasn't clear enough to make out a license plate or anything like that. I feel so bad for the guy who got his wallet stolen -- I mean, don't leave you wallet in your car on a DC street, even if it is locked -- but still it really sucks for him. He said he didn't have much money in it, and he canceled his credit cards immediately, so basically all the thief did was ruin some random dude's day -- so unnecessary.

  • Speaking of crime, the DC city council rewrote the crime code here, and it's caused some controversy. Most everybody agrees with 95% of it, but the other 5% seems to be following the trend of downplaying certain types of crimes (in this case carjacking) in the name social justice. The mayor vetoed it, but the city council overrode her veto, but then the Republican-led House voted to kill it (because Congress has the ultimate say over DC law), and now I'm not sure where it stands. I haven't been able to figure out if the House can kill it on it's own or if it has to go to the Senate and the president like a normal bill.

  • It puts the mayor in an awkward position of potentially being helped out by a party of which she is not a member and a system (Congressional rule of DC) she hates. I'm with the mayor on this one. Crime in DC (as in many other cities) is currently at an unacceptable level, and the effects of this are disproportionately felt by people of color (like the guy who got his wallet jacked). Reducing crime, not the penalties for committing crimes, seems to me the move we should make in the name of social justice.

Well, that's all I got for today. Until next time...

Saturday, February 4, 2023

Entry 649: Hey Bulldog

I got a Spotify account and it has kinda changed my life -- or at least the exercise portion of my life. Back in the day, I had this little iPod that I would listen to whenever I went running. I curated my exercise list over many years, but then I lost the iPod in the transition from Australia to India to the US back in 2011. I never backed up my music library, and I didn't want to pay for yet another streaming service, so after that I switched to listening to podcasts while I ran. Podcasts are okay, but I missed music. I realized that during exercise was pretty much the only time I listened to music regularly, so by moving to podcasts, I almost eliminated music listening from my life all together. I then tried free Pandora for a bit, but I hated the ads, and I hated not being able to pick the actual songs myself. I also tried listening to the few songs in my iPhone library, but it got old quick. So, I just stuck with podcasts.

But then, a few weeks ago, S realized we were paying for an unused Spotify account because she bought a family plan so that she could have music and the kids could listen to all their podcasts. I took it over, and now I have music again while I run. It's so awesome. There's an art to building an exercise playlist. The mistake people make is only getting hype music. You need that for sure, but if you're, say, running for 45 minutes, as I usually do, you simply can't keep up that mental "go! go! go!" pace the entire time. You need softer stuff in there too, so that when the harder music comes on it actually has an effect on you. If it's all Rammstein all the time, you become inured to it.

What you really want are songs you get lost in, so that you don't notice the pain. I also like to go really eclectic -- lots of songs from lots of different genres. I want to have no inkling as to what's coming next and then when I hear it be like fuck, yeah, this song rocks!

Here are a few of my staples: 

  • "Big Pimpin", Jay-Z
  • "Only in Dreams", Weezer
  • "Du Hast", Rammstein
  • "Cake By the Ocean", DNCE
  • "I Wanna Be a Girl", King Khan and the Shrines
  • "Coming Home Baby", Skeewiff
  • "Murderers", John Frusciante
  • "Bag Full of Thoughts", The Flaming Lips
  • "You Keep Me Hangin' On", The Supremes
  • "Hey Bulldog", The Beatles

To that last one, I realized that I might actually be a John guy. About a year ago, after I watched all eight hours of the documentary Get Back, I broke down my Beatles fandom and determined I was a Paul guy. But I actually misattributed "Hey Bulldog" to Paul. In researching it, it's seems to be more of a John song. (They both sing on it which, makes it hard to tell by ear.) That might push John over the edge for me. I dunno, though. They're both so good. As I heard somebody say once, "It's like the Beatles had Michael Jordan in his prime, and then another Michael Jordan."

Anyway...

S flew out of the country again today. I got the kids to myself for another week. It's never too bad, but there's always something. Lately, it's been eating. It's so, so difficult to get them to eat anything even remotely healthy. (It's a universal problem with kids, I know. I went out with some dad friends last night, and we were all commiserating over our kids garbage eating habits.) They're both bad, but Lil' S1 is worse, and he's way less active than his brother. With Lil' S2, he'll eat chicken nuggets (the meaty "adult" kind) and baby carrots and drink a cup of milk and then go run around for a half-hour. I can live with that in good conscience. But little Lil' S1 only wants nachos or pasta with cheese (no sauce) or a bagel with cream cheese or pizza. Basically, he just wants cheese on top of empty carbs, and he doesn't do much to burn them off. He does kinda like mushrooms and apples, and he'll begrudgingly eat sweet peppers, but you have to monitor him or else he'll "forget" to eat them.

He made me so mad tonight. I made him this chicken with mushroom soup and rice dish that he will usually eat, and he took two bites and then said he was full. I was like, "Okay, but that's your dinner. Don't ask me for junk food later." Smash cut to five minutes before bedtime, "Dad, can I have I some chips? I'm so hungry." He did not get any chips. I have no problem sending my kids to bed hungry once in a while (plus, he got an apple, so he wasn't totally famished). That's where S and I differ. I think her biggest fear in life is that one of her kids his hungry for longer than 30 seconds.

The most frustrating part is that even if you're a total hard-ass, your kid is still going to eat junk if they want. They could just get it at school. (Last time I saw them serving breakfast it was a box of Cinnamon Toast Crunch, a Go-gurt, and a chocolate milk.) Or he could get it at a friend's house. And even if you clamp down on those avenues, you have to worry about turning snack food into the forbidden fruit (snacks). The kids who had the worst diets freshman year of college were those whose parents forbade them from having any junk food. Once they had open access to snacks and desserts without their parents around, it was like Rumspringa. What you want is for you kid to develop sensible, long-term eating habits, but that seems like a near impossibility given how crap-centric our society is when it comes to food. 

I wouldn't worry about Lil' S1's diet so much if he was more active. But he has a very sedentary lifestyle. He does swimming every Monday and walks home from school a few times a week, but it's not enough to overcome his physical torpor the rest of the week. During the weekend he sits on the sofa almost the entire time. Like, even when Lil' S2 isn't really doing anything, he's moving. He's kicking a ball or trying to punch me or just running around for no reason. Lil' S1 isn't like that. He's pretty much just reading, listening to a podcast, or looking at a screen the entire day. Today I had to bribe him with extra video game time to do calisthenics with me for ten minutes. And he barely he even tried. Although it did lead to a funny exchange.

Me: Come on, man, you're not even trying. Do you want to be somebody who can't even do a single pushup your whole life?

Him: Why not? Plenty of successful people can't do a pushup.

Me: Really? Name one.

Him: Bill Gates.

Me: Actually, you might be right about that.

And I think I'll leave it there, as it's late and I'm tired.

Until next time...