Entry 309: Smoke Alarms are the Bane of My Existence

I've mentioned before in a previous post how much I hate smoke alarms -- not the function they provide, which is obviously very important, but how unnecessarily annoying it is to change their batteries.  I won't reiterate my anti-smoke alarm screed in this post; instead I shall regale you with a new smoke-alarm-related tale of woe.  The story is this ...

S took the kids to her parents' in South Carolina on Monday for an extended Thanksgiving break.  Since I have to work, I will not be joining them until next weed.  On Tuesday, S calls me on Facetime, and before we start to chat, before I even say "hello," I hear that unmistakably irritating beep in the background: *CHIRP*.  We proceed to a conversation something like as follows,

Me: Hello
*CHIRP*
Her: Hey Babe, how's it going?
*CHIRP*
Me: Fine... What's going on with that smoke detector beeping?
*CHIRP*
Her [laughing]: I knew that was going to be the first thing you mentioned!  I told my mom that!
*CHIRP*
[Her mom laughs in the background.]
*CHIRP*
Me: How could I not?  That thing is beeping like every two seconds, literally.  You have to change it.  It's going to drive me crazy, and I'm not even there!
*CHIRP*
Her: I know.  But we can't change it.  You know how my parents have really high ceilings?  It's all the way at the top.
*CHIRP*
Me: Don't you have a ladder or something?  Can't you call somebody with a ladder?
*CHIRP*
Her: We tried.  It's like 25 feet high.  We need a really tall ladder.  We don't have one, nobody we know has one.  We called some friends.
*CHIRP*
Me: You need to buy a ladder or something.
*CHIRP*
Her [becoming increasingly exacerbated]:  Babe... We don- ... We don't even have a car that can get a ladder.  Plus, you know my dad is old and hurt his shoulder.  He can't handle a ladder or climb up on one or anything like that.
*CHIRP*
Me:  So what's your plan?  You're just going to live in a house for two weeks with a dead smoke detector that's constantly beeping?
*CHIRP*
Her: Yes!  It doesn't bother us.
*CHIRP*
Me [in utter disbelief]: Wha-! ... Wha-! ... How can that not bother you?!  That is insane!  It is a loud beep every two seconds!  It is meant to drive you crazy so that you change the battery!  How can nobody be bothered by that?!  What about the kids?  Does it bother them?
*CHIRP*
Her [panning over to Lil' S1 who is sitting at the table playing with toy cars]: Does this beeping bother you?
*CHIRP*
Him [noticing me on the phone]: Daddy!  I went for a walk today with Tha-tha, but there were no ducks.
*CHIRP*
Her [pointing phone back at her]: There's your answer.
*CHIRP*
Me: Yeah, but still ... You've got to fix that.
*CHIRP*
Her: Babe, I tired.  None of my parents friends could help, and I don't have time to spend all day on the phone, and you aren't here to help me with either of these kids, and ...  Can we PLEASE talk about something else?
*CHIRP*
Me [under my breath]: OK, but you do need to get that fixed.

And that was that ... for a little while, at least.  The next day, I emailed S a list of handymen near her parents and begged her to have somebody come out to change the smoke detector battery.  (I tried the fire department, but they will only do it in low-income neighborhoods.)  There are two things with this: 1) I'm flying in Tuesday evening.  If I get there, and that thing is still beeping every two seconds, it might literally drive me temporarily insane.  And since I fly in at night, there won't be any way to get it fixed until the next day.  I might have to get a hotel room.  2)  Even if I don't exist in this scenario, the battery still needs to be changed!  It's beeping for a reason, and it could beep, literally, for months.  Fix the damn thing!

S, to her credit, gets on it and calls a bunch of places and gets somebody to come out.  It's not easy.  Because it's such a small job, nobody with the proper tools (i.e., a really long ladder) wants to bother with it.  But eventually she finds somebody and sets up an appointment.  But they don't come.  The reason is that this place had previously come out to do some work at my in-law's, and my father-in-law thought they were too expensive, so when they called to confirm the appointment, he canceled it!  (Unfortunately, they had his number on record from before, not S's cell phone, even though she gave it to them.)  And to make matters worse, he didn't tell S.  So eventually she calls the company to try to figure out where they are, and they explain what happened, and then she gets upset and confronts her father, and then he gets upset, and it causes an argument, and the house is in discord -- and to top it all off, the damn thing still isn't fixed!

S reschedules and the guy eventually comes out, spends like three minutes climbing up his ladder and taking out the battery, and then gives her a bill for -- get this -- $275!  She pays it and of course can't ask her parents for any reimbursement, so we spend nearly $300 to do a job that costs about $3 of manpower to do on your own (about $1.25 for the battery and another $1.75 for the three minutes of labor), and it's not even for our house.  Whatever.  I'll gladly pay the money if it means the bleeping will be stopped and the house will again will be peaceful and quiet (other than our kids, of course).

So I guess S's dad was right when he said that company was too expensive.  But the thing is, you have to overpay for something like this.  Nobody is going to come out for $20 when they could be earning x times that somewhere else.  Now, $275 is absolutely ridiculous.  That's more than we paid to have a plumber unclog a slow drain, which is a much bigger job.  And probably, given some more time, S could have found a better deal.  But that's something you start doing as soon as you hear the first beep.  S said she noticed beeps while talking to her parents on the phone months ago.  She told her dad to find somebody to fix it, and he just never did.  So that's how the price gets up to $300.  You get desperate.  Plus $300 is cheaper than the week's worth of hotel rooms I would have run up if I got there and it was still chirping every three seconds.

Anyway, I'm just glad it's over.  Apparently most modern smoke detectors don't even need a battery because they are hard-wired into the circuitry of the house.  The battery is only a backup in case the fire were to cause the power to go out.  Also, my in-law's house is very open.  Any fire would almost certainly set off every detector in the house.  The only reason that detector was even there is because the house builder had to follow code, which says that you must put a smoke detector six inches from the highest ceiling.  So I'm not worried about the house being unsafe.  The only bad part now (other than the money) is that S got kind of annoyed with me, because she got stuck in the middle of it all, with me telling her one thing and her dad telling her the opposite.  I understand that, and I apologized for it, but, between you and me, I don't really feel bad about it.  On the contrary, I feel like I was the voice of reason in this whole ordeal.

Anyway ... two quick thoughts on France -- real problems -- before we part.

• The attacks in Paris were horrific, and what else is horrific is the anti-refugee, anti-Muslim response of many (mostly Republican) government officials.  It's become a bit clichéd to say "This is exactly what the terrorists want."  But it's also true.  ISIS poses no existential threat to the US.  A group of 100,000 (or thereabouts) confined to a relatively small portion of the Middle East cannot eradicate a nation of $300 million protected by oceans, especially when that nation has the most advanced military in the history of civilization.  But, what terrorist can do is terrorize.  And they can facilitate the culture war they so desperately want.  The worst thing we can do right now is turn our backs on good, peace-loving Muslims.  Muslims in the US do not commit acts of terror at a higher rate than any other group, because they are relatively well-integrated into American society.  They are part of us.  We need to keep it this way.  And all it requires is treating American Muslims like we treat all other Americans.  And treating Muslim refugees like we treat Christian refugees.  It shouldn't be difficult.  But for so many of us (mainly Republicans) it is.
• As you probably noticed, a lot of people used that French flag Facebook thing to temporarily change their profile pics.  Then because this was something on the Internet, there was a backlash to it.  I understand the backlash, but I disagree with it.  The reason we care more about France than other countries is because we have a different relationship with France than other countries.  We go way back with France.  France was our ally in the Revolutionary War and in both World Wars.  They are a NATO member.  Lots of Americans visit France and have many French friends and family, and vice-versa.  We are old friends with France in a way we aren't with Lebanon or Iraq or Syria or many other countries.  It's not that French lives are objectively more important than any other lives; it's that we, as Americans, are, on the whole, tighter, and thus more sympathetic, with France than we are with these other countries.  Yes, historically, the reason for this is largely that French people are, like us, mostly white and Christian, but that isn't really relevant.  If you have an old friend you grew up with because your parents were culturally similar and then tragedy befalls this friend, it's perfectly appropriate to show support for this friend in a way you wouldn't somebody you didn't know as well.  It's the same thing at a national level.

Until next time ...

Entry 308: Everybody's Working on the Weekend

One of the best things about my job is that I'm not expected to work during non-work hours.  I typically turn my work computer off around 6:00 in the evening and do not turn it back on until about 9:30 the next morning.  I keep it off the entire weekend, and I don't have any work stuff on my personal computer -- when I'm off, I'm off.  This is, I believe, something of a rarity in the "tech" industry.  (I'd say my company is half tech, half consulting.)  I read the horror stories of people in Silicon Valley or at Amazon who essentially live in the office (why do you think those companies have gyms and daycares and cafes and other "amenities" in their buildings?) or are effectively "on call" at all hours of the day, and I think it sounds awful.

Not everybody agrees with me on this one.  I have friends who want to work -- or at least don't mind working -- longer hours because it puts them in good standing with their company (and leads to more $$$), or as my wife says when she works during her off-hours: "It actually makes things easier on me to do it now.  I mean, I have to get the work done one way or the other."  I try to point out that this is the mindset that management wants her have, that she's been brainwashed by The Man, that we are more than just cogs in our corporate overlords' moneymaking machines, and then I quote The Dead Kennedys to her, at which point, I realize that she is no longer in the room.

Anyway, I bring this up, of course, because I had to work this weekend.  On Friday I was put on a project that needs to be done by Monday -- Monday in Australia.  So basically I was up until 1:00 a.m. last night working on it.  And now I'm tired and have to do all the other things I was going to do yesterday today, so, yet again, I am short on blogging time.  This will be another brief entry.   The upside is that because I worked this weekend, I get the Wednesday before Thanksgiving off.  And also, next week I will have much more free time, as S is taking the kids to South Carolina tomorrow (I will join them the following).  I won't lie I'm looking forward to the break.

Until next time...

Entry 307: Can I Squeeze In An Entry?

If you are reading this entry, it's a minor miracle.  I've had almost no time to blog recently, and this weekend is no exception.  I've got a packed day tomorrow (a birthday party and then a visit from a friend), so I'm going to try to squeeze this in now.  I'm home alone with both kids, one of whom is sleeping and one of whom is throwing his cars off the stairs.  Can you guess which one is which?  S is out getting her nails done.  We had an agreement worked out whereby she would take the kids to Lil' S1's soccer practice in the morning, thus giving me an opportunity to sleep in (which I haven't had in months), and I in return would watch the kids in the afternoon so that she could do her thing.  It was a fine plan, except, of course, that it has been pissing down rain all day today, so soccer was canceled, and so everybody was home this morning, and so me sleeping in was (ironically) nothing more than a dream.  I definitely got the short end of the child-rearing stick with this one -- but what can you do?  It was nobody's fault and S has gotten the short end of the child-rearing stick more times than I have, so ... whatever.

Hold on ... baby is crying.  I have to take a break.

Okay, I'm back, and now my kids have switched roles.  The big one is finally down for a nap and the little one is fussing in his bassinet.  Heaven forbid they both go down at the same time.  I have trouble getting Lil' S2 calmed down when he gets riled up.  Part of the problem is that I have a trick back and if I hold him while standing for more than a few minutes, it just starts to ache unbearably, so I have to sit down, which of course he hates, as somehow babies know the position that is most uncomfortable for you, and it's the only position they want to be in.  Another part of the problem is that he doesn't take to the bottle very well.  I think he likes breastfeeding so much that he doesn't like eating in any other form.  Even when I know he's really hungry I have to coax him into drinking from the bottle, and sometimes he still doesn't take it.  There have been a few times when I've been watching him at night and I just can't get him to take the bottle, and he starts crying so loudly that S wakes up (even though I have him in the basement) and has to breastfeed him.  That's what I mean when I say she gets the short end of the child-rearing stick more times than I do.  But, you know the old saying: Heavy is the chest, who wears the milk dispensers.

Anyway...

As I mentioned in my last post, my parents were in town recently for about a week and half.  It was really nice to see them, but I didn't get to spend as much time with them as I would have liked.  I literally have zero vacation days remaining for the rest of the year, so I had to work all day, and then by the time I got back and we got the kids fed, bathed, and to bed, I was worn down to a nub and just wanted to sit on the couch and drift into my own world, which doesn't cohere well with having company.  But the good thing about family is that they are family.  My parents completely understood, and they got to see the baby, which was the main point of the trip.  Also, my dad did a bunch of handyman work, which was awesome.  He fixed a light fixture, replaced a damaged (and dangerous) electrical socket, cleaned out the trap in our dishwasher, helped me put up a door, and replaced a broken plug on a lamp.  Those are things about being a homeowner that I'm just not good at.

We also had a good weekend in Pennsylvania.  We went to Sesame Place on Halloween.  Sesame Place, as you can probably surmise, is a Sesame Street themed amusement park outside of Philadelphia.  It's pretty cool.  Lil' S1 was a bit too small to go on most the rides, but there was still plenty of stuff for him to do.  He went down a giant slide, like, ten times, and he played for a long time on this big net stuffed full of yoga balls that also has a slide at the top.  That thing was kid anarchy -- "Lord of the Flies," as my dad called it.  

I was curious to see how Lil' S1 would behave.  He's a good climber, but he's small, so he gets pushed around (usually inadvertently) by bigger kids.  Sometimes at the playground if there are too many older kids with him on a big toy, he gets irritated and finds something else to do.  But he stuck with it and held his own pretty well.  He did two things that cracked me up: 1) He put his hand up in a stop gesture at a kid who was encroaching on his space (the kid stopped, despite being about twice Lil' S's size); 2) He asked a bigger kid to give him a boost at a particularly precipitous spot (which she did).

After visiting the amusement park, we went to a nearby hotel where we stayed the night.  I had an event in Philly that I needed to attend, so my parents fed the little man and put him to bed.  The next morning we went to the city and saw the Liberty Bell and bummed around the neighboring environs.  It was fun.  The bell itself is pretty underwhelming -- or rather it looks just like you'd think it looks because you've seen a million photos of it (it's cracked!) -- but there are a lot of parks nearby, and it was a beautiful fall day, so it was nice to walk around and let Lil' S1 play in the leaves.  

We looked for a place to eat lunch, but everything was closed (an off-season Sunday), so we just got in the car and left.  We planned on stopping on the way and getting something to eat when we gassed up, but after driving a few miles out of the city I realized we were on empty -- like empty empty, like reserve-tank-light-flashing empty.  So I had to pull off the road ASAP and fill up, and the whole stop ended up taking like 20 minutes (my mom wanted to get water and then as soon as I put the keys in to finally leave Lil' S1 announced he had to use the bathroom), and nobody was starving, so we just drove all the way home straight through and skipped lunch.

Okay, Lil' S2 has gone from "kinda fussy" to "on the verge of a meltdown."  I had better try to feed him or something.  I kinda got an entry in.

Until next time ...

Entry 306: Lack of Entries

I have not put up any new entries in a while because my parents have been in town the past few weeks, and I've been spending the relatively little amount of free time I have with them.  Normal blogging will (hopefully) return this weekend.

Entry 305: My Favorite Cartoonist

I'm short on time and energy this weekend.  Lil' S1 has a busy schedule, which means I have a busy schedule as well.  Also, I haven't been sleeping enough.  I'm on a roughly 1:15 a.m. - 7:45 a.m. sleeping schedule, which is manageable if I can sleep-in one weekend day.  Like, if I sleep six and a half hours, six days a week, and then sleep in without an alarm on Saturday or Sunday, I'm good.  I just need on morning to totally crash out and pay off my sleep debt that accrues throughout the rest of the week.  I used to be able to do that, but now Lil' S1 has soccer Saturday mornings, and S has sessions with a personal trainer on Sunday mornings, so I'm S.O.L.

Also, I might be coming down with something.  Or I'm just feeling the effects of forgetting to drink coffee this morning.  I'm not sure.  I have a pot on now, so we will see if I feel better after I get my drug in me.

All of this is to say I don't have time for a long entry this weekend.  But I wanted to post something I saw online by Bill Watterson, the guy who wrote Calvin & Hobbes, my favorite strip of all-time.  It's a comic about "success" that really rings true to me.  One line that particularly grabs me: "Someone who takes an undemanding job because it affords him the time to pursue other interests and activities ... is considered a flake."  Sometimes I think that I should be more ambitious with my career -- try to "move up the ladder," try to make money, try to take on more responsibility, try to acquire more prestige.  But then I think "nah ... that sounds terrible."  And I go back to the crossword puzzle or the blog I was working on.

Anyway, here's the comic.  I found it genuinely touching.

(Note: the writing is kind of small/blurry below, so here's a link to a clearer copy.)

Entry 304: Listservs -- More Harm Than Good?

I'm on a neighborhood listserv, which sounds like a good thing in theory -- keep up with what's going on around me and whatnot -- but might not be such a good thing in practice.  For one thing, the amount of messages to read is annoying.  (I fiddled with the settings, so that I only get one actual email each day, but it often contains ten or more messages.)  For another thing, it often turns into nothing other than a crime alert, and that's what I'm unsure of.  Is that good or bad?  I want to be aware if there is a major crime spree going on in the neighborhood, but do I really need to hear everybody's individual tale about how their car was broken into?  Is that helpful or is it just alarmist?  I don't know.  (And try reading about crime and then staying up late listening to a podcast on the Charles Manson murders.  You're jumping out of your seat at the smallest creek or bump.)

Thankfully the crime in my neighborhood is mostly nonviolent, and we've experienced very little of it.  A few years ago, my in-laws' car was broken into, but that's it.  Now we don't keep anything of value in our car, except the car seats, which are actually quite expensive (one of them is at least), but, I imagine, they aren't great targets for potential thieves.  They take a few minutes to unhook and pull out of the car, and they are relatively heavy and cumbersome -- they aren't amendable to smash and grab.  Also, I like to think there is honor among thieves and that kids' stuff is off limits.  But that's probably just romantic thinking on my part.  If somebody is low enough to break into your car and take, say, your purse, they probably would take your car seat too if it was worth their while.

Having your car broken into is concerning, but it's not downright frightening like the thought of having your house burglarized.  We've never seen any signs of anybody trying to break into our house, but it does happen in my neighborhood.  I think (hope) we'll be OK, because 1) despite the individual cases that people put up on the listserv, our neighborhood is still pretty safe -- the vast majority of people aren't getting burglarized and never will (we have packages delivered almost everyday, and nobody has so much as stolen a package off our porch); 2) we have a good alarm system; 3) we're on a major road and our backyard is not accessible by a side street or an alley.  That last one seems to be key, as in every case on the listserv, the criminals accessed the back door of the house through an alley.

One reason the listserv definitely is good, however, is because it brings together neighbors, so that they can coordinate possible solutions.  For example, people are talking about buying security cameras and aiming them strategically, so that they cover most the alleys, which I think is a great idea.  I'm a pro security camera guy.  I've done almost a complete 180 on them from where I used to be; whereas before I found them extremely distasteful and intrusive, now I'm OK with the idea of every public area being recorded at all times.  I'm aware of the downside -- the privacy concerns -- but I think the upside far outweighs this.

We actually have the technology to do this -- as a society, I mean.  You can put a camera in the air and have it record an entire city all day.  Once the footage is captured, the technology is so good that it can zoom in on any part of the city and see what is going on.  You can only see broad shapes, but that is often sufficient.  For example, if somebody broke into a house, you could find the house at the time of the robbery, and see what was going on outside the house.  If there was a get-away car, you could follow it to see where it went.  I learned all about this on a podcast, but I can't remember which one.  Ah ... it was Radiolab.  I recommend giving it a listen; it was a good episode.  Actually, they're all pretty good.  It's a good program.  I could go without all the noises and sound effects -- it's a bit overproduced at times -- but that's a small nit.

Anyway, I think the main reason people don't like security cameras is because a) it feels kind of creepy to know you're being recorded at all times; b) they are worried that the government is going to turn into Big Brother.  On a), I think we just need to get used to this.  The technology is there, and it isn't going away.  Even if it's not an "eye in the sky," it's security footage from a residence or a business or a passer-by with an iPhone.  Being that we all carry around with us little cameras pretty everywhere we go, we should probably just behave as if somebody is filming us all the time.

On b), I think this fear is based,literally, on fiction.  The term Big Brother is from a fictitious novel.  I think books like 1984 are so good and so powerful that we collectively forget that they are complete make-believe.  And basing your life philosophies on make-believe is a great way to lose touch with reality and look like a fool.  (See examples here and here and here.)  I mean, I love George Orwell, but what if he just got it wrong?  He wasn't a seer; 1984 isn't a prophecy (although Animal Farm seems to get truer and truer each election cycle).  Yes, things like the NSA illegally spying on citizens are concerning, but really that's still a far cry from Big Brother.  And on the flip side, what about the good that all this surveillance can do?  It seems to me technology is being used not so that the government can oppress the people, but so that people can more effectively police themselves and in many cases, police the government.  Think about it -- what's the hottest topics right now in policing?  Bodycams.

The key, in my view, is not whether or not we should exploit surveillance technology, but rather who has access to the footage.  If we all have access to it -- if, for example, anybody can go online and watch footage of any public place at any given time -- and we all know that anybody can do this, then why is this a bad thing?  Won't it just make us all safer and more accountable?  Or at the very least, won't it be better than the alternative, which is that this technology is out there and is being deployed in an ad-hoc manner of nebulous legality.  It seems to the answer is clearly yes.

But, I dunno, maybe I'm way off on this, and if we don't limit surveillance soon, it's only a matter of time before the world becomes doubleplusungood, and I'm in Room 101, sleep deprived and defeated, while the Octonauts song "Creature Report" torments me on endless loop in the background...  Oh wait, that's my life now.



Until next time...

Entry 303: Hurricane Joaquin (Andujar)

The good news is Hurricane Joaquin is almost certainly not going to hit Washington D.C. -- or anyway else is the mainland United States.  The bad news is that its residual storms are here right now.  It has been raining since Thursday morning with nothing but rain through the weekend.  I feel like I've been living on Venus for the past few days.  (That's a reference to Ray Bradbury's excellent short story "All Summer In a Day", but of course, you already knew that.)  I've been trying to come up with a good pun to described how wet it is here, and I've come up with three candidates.

1. It's not raining cats and dogs; it's raining cattle and dogies.  (Eh ... kinda weak.)
2. I guess that's why they call it WASHington.  (Not much better.)
3. We haven't had a reign this bad, for this long, since George Bush was in the White House!  (Get it -- reign/rain?  It works better verbally when there is no difference between the two, but it's not terrible written.) 

I like the name Joaquin for a hurricane, because it reminds me of Joaquin Andujar, a pitcher for the St. Louis Cardinals in the '80s, who frequently resembled a hurricane on the mound because he had such a bad temper.  One of my earliest baseball memories is of him going ballistic in Game 7 of the 1985 World Series and having to be physically restrained by his teammates to keep from throttling umpire Don Denkinger.  Andjuar was a hothead and undoubtedly upset that his team was about to lose the World Series (they lost Game 7 11-0), so some of it was just his own shit.  But also the entire Cardinals team was anti-Denkinger for a notoriously awful (and crucial) call he made the game before.  In fact, it is not out of the question that Cardinals manager Whitey Herzog put the temperamental Andujar in the game (already a blowout) for the express purpose of needling Denkinger.

But enough about rain and baseball...

In other news, my kids are a pain in my neck.  Literally.  I woke up this morning with some sort of funky neck strain.  It's quite uncomfortable -- to the point "painful" might be a more apt adjective -- and I think it can be attributed to my kids.  Lil' S1 jumps on my back and climbs on me every chance he gets, and Lil' S2 is so fussy these days that the only way I can get him to calm down is to hold him and walk around, which after like 20 twenty minutes, starts to put a strain on my body.  Last night was the worse.  I had him from 8 p.m. to 1 a.m., and I think he slept a total of a half hour during that time.  He kept doing that thing babies do where they fall asleep in your arms, and then the second you set them down they snap awake and start crying inconsolably.  So then you are left in the no-win situation of either letting them cry it out, which is incredibly stressful (what's worse than a wailing baby?), or picking them back up and starting the cycle anew.  And it would be one thing if they just let you hold them and sit on the couch, but Lil' S2 does not go for that.  He wants you carrying him and walking around while you do it.  Somehow the position that is most comfortable for you is inversely proportional to the position that is most comfortable for him.

Well, if there is any consolation, it is that I get to listen to a lot of podcasts.  The podcast is, in my opinion, the greatest innovation of the "smartphone era."  I listen to several hours of podcasts everyday.  I don't know how I did mundane activities before them.  Seriously, how did I get any chores done pre-2010?  Was I just bored all the time?  The newest one I started listening to is called You Must Remember This.  The podcast is about early Hollywood, a subject I don't know if I would be generally interested in, but there is a 12-episode series on Charlie Manson that is just riveting.  It's the most intriguing podcast I've heard since Serial, and it might even be better than Serial, because it's more of an "experience."  Sarah Koenig narrates the events of Serial in a very Ira-Glass-esque, half-reporter, half-understated-storyteller type of way, which makes sense (she used to be a reporter and Ira Glass is her boss), and it works for her, but that style is honestly a bit played out.  I think because This American Life is so successful, too many budding podcasters have copied its format and style, so now, through no fault of its own, it's kinda tired.  (Though I still very much enjoy it.)  It's like when a really good song gets played on the radio too much, you get sick of it, even though it is still a really good song.  (Hey ya ... Hey ya ... Shake it ... shake it ... shake it like a Polaroid picture ...)

You Must Remember This, on the other hand, is much more -- I don't know what the right adjective is -- edgy?  gritty?  spooky?   Whatever it is, I love listening to it.  Karina Longworth, the narrator and creator, does a fantastic job with it.  It helps, of course, that the Manson story is so fucked up and intriguing on its own, it doesn't really matter who is telling it, but Longworth's vibe and storytelling definitely add to the experience.  One thing I didn't know about the Manson story is how involved Candice Bergen was in the whole thing -- indirectly, through her ex-boyfriend Terry Melcher -- but still...  It's weird to hear all this stuff about Bergen, as I don't have any recollection of her pre-1988, so the whole time I'm listening to it all and thinking: "Murphy Brown?"

OK, baby is awake.  Gotta go.

Until next time ...